Bibliographie. Finalisme en biologie

Export de ma bibliothèque Zotero sur le finalisme au 29 octobre 2024

Allen, C., & Neal, J. (2020). Teleological Notions in Biology. In E. N. Zalta (Éd.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entrieseleology-biology/

Ariew, A. (2007). Teleology. In D. L. Hull & M. Ruse (Éds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (p. 160‑181). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521851282.009

Astolfi, J.-P., & Peterfalvi, B. (1997). Stratégies de travail des obstacles : Dispositifs et ressorts. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 25(1), 193‑216. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/8685

Ayala, F. J. (1998). Teleological Explanations versus Teleology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 20(1), 41‑50.

Babcock, G. (2023). Teleology and function in non-living nature. Synthese, 201(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04099-1

Babcock, G., & McShea, D. W. (2021). An externalist teleology. Synthese, 199(3), 8755‑8780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03181-w

Babcock, G., & McShea, D. W. (2023). Resolving teleology’s false dilemma. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 415‑432. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac058

Baluška, F., Miller, W. B., & Reber, A. S. (2023). Cellular and evolutionary perspectives on organismal cognition : From unicellular to multicellular organisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 503‑513. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac005

Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition, 133(1), 277‑303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017

Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2015). “Everything Happens for a Reason” : Children’s Beliefs About Purpose in Life Events. Child Development, 86(2), 503‑518. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12312

Barnes, M. E., Evans, E. M., Hazel, A., Brownell, S. E., & Nesse, R. M. (2017). Teleological reasoning, not acceptance of evolution, impacts students’ ability to learn natural selection. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-017-0070-6

Barton, N. H. (2022). The “New Synthesis”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), e2122147119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122147119

Bartov, H. (1978). Can students be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(6), 567‑572. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150619

Bartov, H. (1981). Teaching students to understand the advantages and disadvantages of teleological and anthropomorphic statements in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(1), 79‑86. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660180113

Bateson, P., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions : An appreciation and an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(12), 712‑718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.013

Bich, L., & Damiano, L. (2008). Order in the Nothing : Autopoiesis and the Organizational Characterization of the Living. In Physics of Emergence and Organization (p. 339‑369). WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812779953_0015

Bomblies, K., & Peichel, C. L. (2022). Genetics of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), e2122152119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122152119

Breitenbach, A. (2009). Teleology in Biology : A Kantian Perspective. Kant Yearbook, 1(2009), 31‑56. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110196672.31

Brock, R., & Kampourakis, K. (2023). A Justification of Legitimate Teleological Explanations in Physics Education. Science & Education, 32(4), 927‑945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00358-8

Brock, R., Tsourakis, N., & Kampourakis, K. (2024). Using Text Mining to Identify Teleological Explanations in Physics and Biology Textbooks : An Exploratory Study. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00513-3

Brumby, M. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13(2), 119‑122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1979.9654240

Buzzoni, M. (2015). Causality, Teleology, and Thought Experiments in Biology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 46(2), 279‑299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9293-9

Calcott, B. (2013a). Why how and why aren’t enough : More problems with Mayr’s proximate-ultimate distinction. Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 767‑780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9367-1

Calcott, B. (2013b). Why the Proximate–Ultimate Distinction is Misleading, and Why it Matters For Understanding the Evolution of Cooperation. In K. Sterelny, R. Joyce, B. Calcott, & B. Fraser (Éds.), Cooperation and Its Evolution (p. 21). MIT Press.

Caño, L., & Ormazabal, U. (2023). Basque secondary school students’ understanding of natural selection and teleological reasoning : Knowledge vs. knowledge application. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 537‑554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933131

Caponi, G. (2020). The Darwinian Naturalization of Teleology. In L. Baravalle & L. Zaterka (Éds.), Life and Evolution : Latin American Essays on the History and Philosophy of Biology (p. 121‑142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39589-6_8

Capraru, M. (2024). Teleological Functional Explanations : A New Naturalist Synthesis. Acta Biotheoretica, 72(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-024-09480-2

Christensen, W. (1996). A complex systems theory of teleology. Biology and Philosophy, 11(3), 301‑320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128784

Clawson, W. P., & Levin, M. (2023). Endless forms most beautiful 2.0 : Teleonomy and the bioengineering of chimaeric and synthetic organisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 457‑486. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac073

Clément, P., & Quessada, M.-P. (2013). Les conceptions sur l’évolution biologique d’enseignants du primaire et du secondaire dans 28 pays varient selon leur pays et selon leur niveau d’étude. In R. Etienne (Éd.), L’Actualité de la Recherche en Éducation et Formation (p. 19 pages). Université Montpellier 3 / AREF. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01026095

Cooper, A. (2018). Two directions for teleology : Naturalism and idealism. Synthese, 195(7), 3097‑3119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1364-5

Corning, P. A. (2014). Evolution ‘on purpose’ : How behaviour has shaped the evolutionary process: Behaviour and the Evolutionary Process. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 112(2), 242‑260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12061

Corning, P. A. (2019). Teleonomy and the proximate–ultimate distinction revisited. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127(4), 912‑916. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz087

Corning, P. A. (2023). Culture–gene co-evolution : Darwin’s other theory comes into view. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 563‑569. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac048

Corning, P. A., Kauffman, S. A., Noble, D., Shapiro, J. A., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Pross, A. (Éds.). (2023). Evolution « on purpose » : Teleonomy in living systems. The MIT Press.

D’Ambrosio, M., & Santos, N. B. and F. S. dos. (2018). Difficulties in teaching evolution due to the influence of teleology. Filosofia e História Da Biologia, 13(2), Article 2.

Deacon, T. W., & García-Valdecasas, M. (2023). A thermodynamic basis for teleological causality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 381(2252), 20220282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0282

de Laguna, G. A. (1962). The Role of Teleonomy in Evolution. Philosophy of Science, 29(2), 117‑131.

de Ricqlès, A., & Gayon, J. (2011). Fonction. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, & M. Silberstein (Éds.), Les mondes darwiniens (2e éd., Vol. 1, p. 177‑201). Matériologiques.

Desmond, H., & Huneman, P. (2020). The Ontology of Organismic Agency : A Kantian Approach. In A. Altobrando & P. Biasetti (Éds.), Natural Born Monads (p. 33‑64). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110604665-003

Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125‑129.

Dortier, J.-F. (2013). Révolution dans le vivant. In Histoire et philosophie des sciences (p. 122‑128). Éditions Sciences Humaines. https://doi.org/10.3917/sh.lepel.2013.01.0122

Dresow, M., & Love, A. C. (2023). Teleonomy : Revisiting a Proposed Conceptual Replacement for Teleology. Biological Theory, 18(2), 101‑113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00424-y

Duchesneau, F. (1997). Philosophie de la biologie. Presses universitaires de France.

Dupont, B.-M. (2014). Lumière derrière, lumière devant. Hegel, 2(2), 181‑190. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/53788

Edelaar, P., Otsuka, J., & Luque, V. J. (2022). A generalised approach to the study and understanding of adaptive evolution. Biological Reviews, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12910

Engel Clough, E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19(2), 125‑130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1985.9654708

Enseigner l’évolution de la lignée humaine, le retour des « vieux démons » ? – Sciences de la vie et de la Terre. (s. d.). Consulté 20 novembre 2022, à l’adresse https://svt.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article147

Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231‑1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201005

Fisher, R. A. (avec Osmania University & Digital Library Of India). (1930). The Genetical Theory Of Natural Selection. At The Clarendon Press. http://archive.org/details/geneticaltheoryo031631mbp

Fortin, C. (2014). L’enseignement de l’évolution face aux croyances religieuses. Quelles perspectives curriculaires possibles ? Histoire, monde et cultures religieuses, 32(4), 67‑78. https://doi.org/10.3917/hmc.032.0067

Fortin, C., Guillot, G., Le Louarn Bonnet, M. L., & Lecointre, G. (2021). Guide critique de l’évolution (2e éd.). Belin Education.

Fortin, C., & Reier-Røberg, K. (2016). De la nature de la causalité évolutive à la nature de la biologie évolutive : Types de causalité mobilisés par les élèves en classe de seconde. RDST. Recherches en didactique des sciences et des technologies, 14, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdst.1435

Friedler, Y., Zohar, A., & Tamir, P. (1993). The effect of age and of learning on the ability to distinguish between anthropomorphic and teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 439‑443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150407

Frugière, A. (2020). Rapport du jury, Capes SVT externe, session 2020. https://media.devenirenseignant.gouv.fr/file/externe/72/5/rj2020-capes-externe-sciences_de_la_vie_et_de_la_terre_1355725.pdf

Gambarotto, A. (2019). Teleology : A case study in iHPS. In The Past, Present, and Future of Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.

Gambarotto, A., & Mossio, M. (2024). Enactivism and the Hegelian Stance on Intrinsic Purposiveness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 155‑177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09823-9

Gambarotto, A., & Nahas, A. (2022). Teleology and the organism : Kant’s controversial legacy for contemporary biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 93, 47‑56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.005

Gandolfo, G. (2008). Le concept de milieu dans les sciences du vivant. Noesis, 14, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/noesis.1674

García-Valdecasas, M. (2022). On the naturalisation of teleology : Self-organisation, autopoiesis and teleodynamics. Adaptive Behavior, 30(2), 103‑117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712321991890

García-Valdecasas, M., & Deacon, T. W. (2024). Biological functions are causes, not effects : A critique of selected effects theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103, 20‑28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.11.002

Garson, J. (2007). Function and Teleology. In S. Sahotra & A. Plutynski (Éds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (1^re éd., p. 525‑549). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696590.ch28

Geraedts, C. L., & Boersma, K. Th. (2006). Reinventing Natural Selection. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 843‑870. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404722

Ghiselin, M. T. (2002). Teleology : Grounds for Avoiding Both the Word and the Thing. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 24(3/4), 487‑491.

Gilroy, S., & Trewavas, T. (2023). Agency, teleonomy and signal transduction in plant systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 514‑529. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac021

Gontier, N. (2023). Teleonomy as a problem of self-causation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 388‑414. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac111

González de Prado, J., & Saborido, C. (2023). Biological Purposes Beyond Natural Selection : Self-Regulation as a Source of Teleology1. Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00695-2

González Galli, L. M., & Meinardi, E. N. (2011). The Role of Teleological Thinking in Learning the Darwinian Model of Evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0272-7

Gresch, H., & Martens, M. (2019). Teleology as a tacit dimension of teaching and learning evolution : A sociological approach to classroom interaction in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 243‑269. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21518

Haig, D. (2013). Proximate and ultimate causes : How come? and what for? Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 781‑786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9369-z

Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G., & Silberstein, M. (2011). Les mondes darwiniens. Matériologiques.

Hedegaard, M. (1996). How Instruction Influences Children’s Concepts of Evolution. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 11‑24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_3

Hennig, B. (2011). Teleonomy. History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis, 14(1), 185‑202. https://doi.org/10.30965/26664275-01401012

Henning, B. G., & Scarfe, A. C. (2013). Beyond mechanism : Putting life back into biology. Lexington books.

Heylighen, F. (2023). The meaning and origin of goal-directedness : A dynamical systems perspective. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 370‑387. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac060

Hitchen, S. A. (2014, février 20). Adapting our Language : The Problem (?) of Teleological Language in the Philosophy of Biology. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10550/

Hoquet, T. (2014). Le philosophe à Lilliput. Critique, n° 803(4), 293. https://doi.org/10.3917/criti.803.0293

Hovhannisyan, G. (2022). Specifying the conditions for a theory of teleology in cognitive science. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 42(3), 131‑145. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000184

Hull, D. L., & Ruse, M. (Éds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge University Press.

Hulswit, M. (1996). Teleology : A Peircean Critique of Ernst Mayr’s Theory. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 32(2), 182‑214.

Huneman, P. (2010). Assessing the Prospects for a Return of Organisms in Evolutionary Biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 341‑371.

Huneman, P. (2017). Kant’s Concept of Organism Revisited : A Framework for a Possible Synthesis between Developmentalism and Adaptationism? The Monist, 100(3), 373‑390. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx016

Igamberdiev, A. U. (2023). Overcoming the limits of natural computation in biological evolution toward the maximization of system efficiency. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 539‑554. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac093

Imam, A. A. (1989). Misconstruing behavioral consequences : Teleology or teleonomy. The Behavior Analyst, 12(1), 81‑83.

Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2020). Inheritance systems and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Cambridge University Press.

Jablonka, E., Lamb, M. J., & Zeligowski, A. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions : Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life (Revised edition). A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.

Johnston, I. G., Dingle, K., Greenbury, S. F., Camargo, C. Q., Doye, J. P. K., Ahnert, S. E., & Louis, A. A. (2022). Symmetry and simplicity spontaneously emerge from the algorithmic nature of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(11), e2113883119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113883119

Katsnelson, M. I., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2019). On the feasibility of saltational evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 21068‑21075. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909031116

Kauffman, S. A., & Roli, A. (2023). What is consciousness? Artificial intelligence, real intelligence, quantum mind and qualia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 530‑538. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac092

Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies : Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1074‑1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030399

Kimura, M. (1985). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Koonin, E. V. (2009). The Origin at 150 : Is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight? Trends in Genetics, 25(11), 473‑475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.007

Koonin, E. V. (2016). Splendor and misery of adaptation, or the importance of neutral null for understanding evolution. BMC Biology, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0338-2

Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I., & Katsnelson, M. I. (2020). No waves of intelligent design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(33), 19639‑19640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011220117

Kull, K. (2023). Choices by organisms : On the role of freedom in behaviour and evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 555‑562. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac077

Lacombe, G. (1987a). Adaptation et théorie de l’évolution. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 4(1), 139‑153. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/9180

Lacombe, G. (1987b). Pour l’introduction de l’histoire des sciences dans l’enseignement du second cycle. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 5(1), 87‑116. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/9232

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., & Feldman, M. W. (1999). Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(18), 10242‑10247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10242

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2013). More on how and why : Cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 719‑745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9335-1

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Myles, S. (2010). How culture shaped the human genome : Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(2), 137‑148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2734

Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited : Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful? Science, 334(6062), 1512‑1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210879

Le Roux, R. (2020). Entre hasard et programme : Monod, Jacob et la cybernétique. Revue d’histoire des sciences, 73(2), 273‑302. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhs.732.0273

Lefèvre, C. (1972). POLYSÉMIE DE « FINALISME » Hippocrate, Aristote et M. Jacques Monod. L’Antiquité Classique, 41(2), 519‑531.

Leidenhag, M. (2021). Purpose for and within Creation : A Theological Appraisal of Organismic Teleology. Modern Theology, 37(2), 396‑409. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12689

Lewis, A. (2024). A hypothesis of teleological evolution, via endogenous acetylcholine, nitric oxide, and calmodulin pathways. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 188, 68‑76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2024.03.003

Lewontin, R. C. (2001). The triple helix : Gene, organism, and environment (1. paperback ed). Harvard University Press.

Lhorne, M.-C. (2011). La naturalisation de l’intentionnalité : Approche et critique de la théorie de Fred Dretske. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, & M. Silberstein (Éds.), Les mondes darwiniens (2e éd., Vol. 2, p. 1453‑1482). Matériologiques.

Lhoste, Y. (2017). Épistémologie et didactique des SVT : Langage, apprentissage, enseignement des sciences de la vie et de la Terre. Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.

Longy, F. (2010). Fonctions et téléologie naturelle : Les enjeux actuels d’une vieille question. Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 28, 175‑206. https://doi.org/10.4000/cps.2786

Lucas, A. M. (1971). The Teaching of “Adaptation”. Journal of Biological Education, 5(2), 86‑90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1971.11665455

Martinand, J.-L. (1992). Enseignement et apprentissage de la modélisation en sciences. INRP.

Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and Effect in Biology : Kinds of causes, predictability, and teleology are viewed by a practicing biologist. Science, 134(3489), 1501‑1506. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3489.1501

Mayr, E. (1974). Teleological and Teleonomic, a New Analysis. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Éds.), A Portrait of Twenty-five Years (p. 133‑159). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5345-1_10

Mayr, E. (1992). The Idea of Teleology. Journal of the History of Ideas, 53(1), 117‑135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709913

Mayr, E. (1998). The Multiple Meanings of « Teleological ». History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 20(1), 35‑40.

Mazzocchi, F. (2010). Complementarity in biology. EMBO reports, 11(5), 339‑344. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.56

McShea, D. W. (2012). Upper-directed systems : A new approach to teleology in biology. Biology & Philosophy, 27(5), 663‑684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9326-2

Moczek, A. P. (2023). When the end modifies its means : The origins of novelty and the evolution of innovation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 433‑440. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac061

Monchamp, A. (1997). Quand les obstacles ouvrent des perspectives pédagogiques : Récit d’un itinéraire personnel. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 25(1), 59‑91. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/8680

Monod, J. (1970). Le Hasard et la nécessité. Seuil.

Morin, E. (1986). La méthode. 3 : La connaisance de la connaissance: anthropologie de la connaissance. Éd. du Seuil.

Morin, E., & Morin, E. (1977). La nature de la nature. Seuil.

Morin, E., & Morin, E. (1980). La vie de la vie. Seuil.

Mossio, M., & Moreno, A. (2010). Organisational Closure in Biological Organisms. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(2/3), 269‑288.

Newman, S. A. (2023). Inherency and agency in the origin and evolution of biological functions. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 487‑502. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac109

Noble, D. (2018). Central Dogma or Central Debate? Physiology, 33(4), 246‑249. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00017.2018

Noble, R., & Noble, D. (2023). Physiology restores purpose to evolutionary biology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 357‑369. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac049

Ongchoco, J. D. K., Castiello, S., & Corlett, P. R. (2023). Excessive teleological thinking is driven by aberrant associations and not by failure of reasoning. iScience, 26(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107643

Orr, H. A. (2005). The genetic theory of adaptation : A brief history. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1523

P110 Epistemologie-specifique-a-la-biologie-rapports-aux-savoirs-disciplinaires-et-perspective-dobstacles-a-la-comprehension-du-vivant. (s. d.). Consulté 26 juillet 2023, à l’adresse https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Catherine-Simard-2/publication/259347119_Epistemologie_specifique_a_la_biologie_rapports_aux_savoirs_disciplinaires_et_perspective_d’obstacles_a_la_comprehension_du_vivant/links/0c96052b271552e365000000/Epistemologie-specifique-a-la-biologie-rapports-aux-savoirs-disciplinaires-et-perspective-dobstacles-a-la-comprehension-du-vivant.pdf#page=110

Perner, J., & Esken, F. (2015). Evolution of human cooperation in Homo heidelbergensis : Teleology versus mentalism. Developmental Review, 38, 69‑88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.005

Peterfalvi, B., Rumelhard, G., & Vérin, A. (1987). Relations alimentaires. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 3(1), 111‑189. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/9188

Phenotypic plasticity & evolution : Contexts, causes, consequences. (2021). CRC PRESS.

Pistes de réflexion sur les obstacles à l’enseignement de la théorie de l’évolution—Deuxième partie : Hasard et finalisme—Sciences de la vie et de la Terre. (s. d.). Consulté 20 novembre 2022, à l’adresse https://svt.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article234

Pistes de réflexion sur les obstacles à l’enseignement de la théorie de l’évolution—Première partie : La théorie de l’évolution en résumé et l’évolution de la théorie—Sciences de la vie et de la Terre. (s. d.). Consulté 20 novembre 2022, à l’adresse https://svt.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article179

Pistes de réflexion sur les obstacles à l’enseignement de la théorie de l’évolution—Troisième partie : Vitalisme et mécanisme—Sciences de la vie et de la Terre. (s. d.). Consulté 20 novembre 2022, à l’adresse https://svt.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article243

Pistes de réflexion sur les obstacles à l’enseignement de l’évolution—Quatrième partie : La place de la Science, Religion et Morale—Sciences de la vie et de la Terre. (s. d.). Consulté 20 novembre 2022, à l’adresse https://svt.ac-versailles.fr/spip.php?article257

Quessada, M.-P., Clément, P., Selmaoui, S., & Valente, A. (2011). L’enseignement de l’évolution dans les manuels scolaires de huit pays riverains de la Méditerranée. Tréma, 35‑36, Article 35‑36. https://doi.org/10.4000/trema.2651

Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. (2013). Learning the Language of Evolution : Lexical Ambiguity and Word Meaning in Student Explanations. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1107‑1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z

Ribeiro, M. G. L., Larentis, A. L., Caldas, L. A., Garcia, T. C., Terra, L. L., Herbst, M. H., & Almeida, R. V. (2015). On the debate about teleology in biology : The notion of « teleological obstacle ». História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 22, 1321‑1333. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702015005000003

Ricqlès, A. de, & Gayon, J. (2011). Fonction. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, & M. Silberstein (Éds.), Les mondes darwiniens (Éditions Matériologiques, Vol. 1, p. 137‑161). Éditions Matériologiques. https://www.cairn-sciences.info/les-mondes-darwiniens-volume-1–9782919694396-page-137.htm

Root-Bernstein, M. (2024). Evolution is not driven by and toward increasing information and complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(34), e2318689121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318689121

Rosenberg, A., & McShea, D. W. (2008). Philosophy of biology : A contemporary introduction. Routledge.

Rouquet, F. (2020). Les savoirs scientifiques relatifs aux végétaux verts : Conceptions finales des élèves en fin de cursus scolaire, difficultés d’apprentissage. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02441651

Rumelhard, G. (1997). Travailler les obstacles pour assimiler les connaissances scientifiques. Aster : Recherches en didactique des sciences expérimentales, 24(1), 13‑35. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/8667

Sachs, C. (2023). Naturalized Teleology : Cybernetics, Organization, Purpose. Topoi, 42(3), 781‑791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09851-9

Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry : Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345‑372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130

Santis, M. D. de. (2020). Teleology and Biology : A defense of teleological thinking in biology. Filosofia e História Da Biologia, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-6224v15i1p61-78

Scott, M. J. (2022). Reasons Things Happen for a Reason : An Integrative Theory of Teleology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 452‑464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621995753

Shapiro, J. A. (2007). Bacteria are small but not stupid : Cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38(4), 807‑819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.09.010

Shapiro, J. A. (2011). Evolution : A view from the 21st century. FT Press Science.

Shapiro, J. A. (2023). Engines of innovation : Biological origins of genome evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 441‑456. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac041

Short, T. L. (1983). Teleology in Nature. American Philosophical Quarterly, 20(4), 311‑320.

Shtulman, A., & McCallum, K. (2014). Cognitive Reflection Predicts Science Understanding. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2937‑2942.

Simard, C. (2015). Conceptions paradigmatiques du vivant et attitudes envers les enjeux relatifs au vivant : Influence des connaissances en biologie d’enseignants et biologistes en formation. Université du Québec.

Simard, C. (2023). Epistemology and biology teaching : Obstacles to a contemporary conceptualisation of living organisms among future teachers and biologists. Journal of Biological Education, 57(2), 432‑451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1924228

Simard, C., Harvey, L., & Samson, G. (2014). Regard multidimensionnel des conceptions du vivant : Situation en contexte québécois. RDST. Recherches en didactique des sciences et des technologies, 9, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdst.852

Simard, C., Harvey, L., & Samson, G. (2015). Épistémologie de la biologie et conceptualisation du vivant chez des futurs enseignants et biologistes. SHS Web of Conferences, 21, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152101002

Singh, R. S. (2024). A Concept of Complementarity Between Complexity and Redundancy can Account for Kant’s Biological Teleology and Unify Mechanistic and Finalistic Biology. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 92(3), 258‑265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-024-10169-w

Sloan, P. R. (2012). How was teleology eliminated in early molecular biology? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 140‑151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.013

Smith, S. L. (2023). How and why we should move beyond natural selection in museums to tackle teleology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 16(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-023-00184-8

Sober, E. (1994). From a biological point of view : Essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and evolution : The logic behind the science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806285

Solal, P. (2010). Darwin et la question de la finalité. Miranda. Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English-speaking world, 1, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.330

Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. (1999). Sex and death : An introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press.

Strauss, B. S. (2017). A Physicist’s Quest in Biology : Max Delbrück and “Complementarity”. Genetics, 206(2), 641‑650. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.201517

Svedholm, A. M., Lindeman, M., & Lipsanen, J. (2010). Believing in the purpose of events—Why does it occur, and is it supernatural? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 252‑265. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1560

Švorcová, J., Lacková, Ľ., & Fulínová, E. (2023). Evolution by habit : Peirce, Lamarck, and teleology in biology. Theory in Biosciences, 142(4), 411‑422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-023-00406-z

Tamir, P. (1985). Causality and Teleology in High School Biology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 3(1), 19‑28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514850030103

Tenaillon, O. (2014). The Utility of Fisher’s Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 45(1), 179‑201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091846

Thompson, N. S. (1987). The Misappropriation of Teleonomy. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Éds.), Perspectives in Ethology : Volume 7 Alternatives (p. 259‑274). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1815-6_10

Touraille, P. (2011). Du désir de procréer : Des cultures plus naturalistes que la Nature ? Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 30(1), 52‑62. https://doi.org/10.3917/nqf.301.0052

Trommler, F., Gresch, H., & Hammann, M. (2018). Students’ reasons for preferring teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 159‑187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1404658

van den Berg, H. (2024). Explanation, teleology, and analogy in natural history and comparative anatomy around 1800 : Kant and Cuvier. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 105, 109‑119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.003

Vane-Wright, R. I. (2023). Turning biology to life : Some reflections. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 570‑587. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac141

Vane-Wright, R. I., & Corning, P. A. (2023). Teleonomy in living systems : An overview. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 341‑356. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blad037

Varella, M. A. C. (2018). The Biology and Evolution of the Three Psychological Tendencies to Anthropomorphize Biology and Evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01839

Vitale, F. (2017). ‘With or Without You…’ : Deconstructing Teleology between Philosophy and Biology. Oxford Literary Review, 39(1), 82‑100. https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.2017.0211

Vitale, F. (2021). The Teleological Program. Ernst Mayr’s Teleonomy from Philosophy to Cybernetics (or Kant’s Revenge). Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi e Saperi Dell’estetico, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-12754

Vorms, M. (2014). Le rôle des diagrammes et des schémas dans l’activité théorique en biologie. In T. Hoquet & F. Merlin (Éds.), Précis de philosophie de la biologie (p. 125‑143). Vuibert. http://www.vuibert.fr/ouvrage-9782311400199-precis-de-philosophie-de-la-biologie.html

Wagner-Egger, P., Delouvée, S., Gauvrit, N., & Dieguez, S. (2018). Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias. Current Biology, 28(16), R867‑R868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.072

Walsh, D. (2012). Mechanism and purpose : A case for natural teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 173‑181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.016

Walsh, D. M. (2006). Organisms as natural purposes : The contemporary evolutionary perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37(4), 771‑791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.009

Walsh, D. M. (2015). Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press.

Wang, H. (2005). Rethinking the Validity and Significance of Final Causation : From the Aristotelian to the Peircean Teleology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 41(3), 603‑625.

Welch, J. J. (2017). What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? Biology & Philosophy, 32(2), 263‑279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9557-8

Werth, A., & Allchin, D. (2020). Teleology’s long shadow. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00118-8

West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press.

Wingert, J. R., Bassett, G. M., Terry, C. E., Cheng, K., & Lee, J. (2023). The effects of religious views and creationism on teleological reasoning, acceptance and understanding of natural selection : A preliminary mixed-methods study. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 16(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-023-00186-6

Wong, M. L., Bartlett, S., Cleland, C. E., Demarest, H., Cleaves, H. J., Prabhu, A., Lunine, J. I., & Hazen, R. M. (2024). Reply to Root-Bernstein : Increasing complexity allows for the pervasiveness of low-complexity entities and is not anthropocentric. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(34), e2406598121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2406598121

Wong, M. L., Cleland, C. E., Arend, D., Bartlett, S., Cleaves, H. J., Demarest, H., Prabhu, A., Lunine, J. I., & Hazen, R. M. (2023). On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(43), e2310223120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310223120

Yip, C.-W. (2009). Causal and teleological explanations in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 149‑151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656174

Zemla, J. C., Steiner, S. M., & Sloman, S. (2016). Analytical Thinking Predicts Less Teleological Reasoning and Religious Belief. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679‑697. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:63.0.CO;2-E”>https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<679::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-E

Crédit de l’image mise en avant : FlickR/Maggie Jones Domaine public

---

---